Squint: A Rant
Avril from Damned Good Design and I have been filing our nails and painting them Jungle Red over the last few days. The subject: The Squint Furniture Collection. The question: What the hell is going on here? The answer: A mystifying and egregious combination of bad taste, bad design, shoddy craftsmanship, combined with an equal dose of something I can only think of as Pulling The Wool Over One’s Eyes-ism.
Certainly patchwork has been done many times. And, there’s tons of Ugly out there. So what has our dander up? Three things.
First, these pieces look so slipshod. The seams don’t match, the patchwork is horrible, there’s no sense of composition or proportion, and the fabric on the legs looks like someone slathered some Elmer’s on it and plopped it into place. It’s just lazy.
Second, Avril suspects the fabrics are comprised of showroom fabric samples. Showrooms lend these to designers who are supposed to return them – not use them for crafts.¬† But Ms. Squint uses a lot of the same patterns. So, they could be discontinued samples. Showrooms either throw these away or give them away to art schools. Either way, they’re free.
Which beings me to issue number three.
The retail price for these starts at $7,300, “depending on the price of the fabric.” WHAT?!?
Take it away Avril:
Great, so someone can upholster a sofa. Me too. But assuming these are samples, and I can’t help it- the size looks JUST like a sample, which are not quite big enough to make into pillows and are bigger than fat quarters so quilting is not an option. This means that they’re cobbled together, from whatever is lying around. And while I’m all for kudos on recycling the samples, is it worth that much? And why is this being touted everywhere as some kind of laudable achievement when the results are… well, iffy at best.
I am all about recycling furniture, too. (I’ve been working on that little IKEA soon-to-be-bar cabinet for months (almost done… still putting the finish on). But I don’t think this is recycled furniture. This looks like the cheap, generic, “traditional” furniture you can get from a catalog that comes in a plain muslin and you take it somewhere and supply the COM [customers own fabric].
Grrrr…
Back to me
I believe in a job well done and a price that’s in line with the quality of that work. Avril and I can’t understand why anyone would think these sofas look good at any price – even if they were being given away.
Is it just us? What do you think?
Related Posts
8 Responses to “Squint: A Rant”
Avatars are randomly assigned unless you get your own
-
Posted by ArtShades on September 19th, 2008 at 6:40 pm
I totally agree with your sentiments! Yuk!
-
Posted by David B on September 19th, 2008 at 6:46 pm
The beauty about putting it somewhere you might have a hangover is, if you get sick on it, who could tell?
-
Posted by Mara Alexander on September 19th, 2008 at 8:45 pm
If anyone needs me, I’ll be gouging my eyes out with a rusty spoon now.
-
Posted by Ron Sylvester on September 20th, 2008 at 7:17 pm
Looks like Walt Disney puked on a couch.
-
Posted by Joe Posch on September 21st, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Honestly, I feel about these the way I felt about Michael Graves’ Dolphin Hotel at Walt Disney World. It’s just too much everywhere. And while I enjoy the button tufting with the patterns on that last piece, the patterns are not juxtaposed well. And I completely agree about the fabric-coated legs. Horrible.
I mean, Paul Smith can juxtapose colors and patterns and it works, so it can be done.
In the immortal words of Nina Garcia, “It’s just not aesthetically pleasing.”
-
Posted by pigtown-design on September 22nd, 2008 at 1:40 pm
It’s very jarring… if i saw it in an alley, i wouldn’t be surprised that someone chucked it out!
-
Posted by Mandy on September 25th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
They look like conversation pieces, but not something you’d actually want in your own home.










I wouldn’t put that last one anywhere near where you might have a hangover.