<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Conundrum of Modern Bicycle Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designholeonline.com/2009/the-conundrum-of-modern-bicycle-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designholeonline.com/2009/the-conundrum-of-modern-bicycle-design/</link>
	<description>Fall in love with where you live</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 18:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: motorbikes</title>
		<link>http://designholeonline.com/2009/the-conundrum-of-modern-bicycle-design/comment-page-1/#comment-14741</link>
		<dc:creator>motorbikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 18:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designholeonline.com/?p=4901#comment-14741</guid>
		<description>WOW very cool, but are the comfortable to ride?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW very cool, but are the comfortable to ride?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misterarthur</title>
		<link>http://designholeonline.com/2009/the-conundrum-of-modern-bicycle-design/comment-page-1/#comment-12992</link>
		<dc:creator>misterarthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designholeonline.com/?p=4901#comment-12992</guid>
		<description>I agree totally, Dave. I guess I didn&#039;t make that clear in my post. (I was dissing the Newsome &#039;design&#039; (and cost), and at the same time, trying to praise the designer of the Giant bicycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree totally, Dave. I guess I didn&#8217;t make that clear in my post. (I was dissing the Newsome &#8216;design&#8217; (and cost), and at the same time, trying to praise the designer of the Giant bicycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Cherling</title>
		<link>http://designholeonline.com/2009/the-conundrum-of-modern-bicycle-design/comment-page-1/#comment-12888</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Cherling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designholeonline.com/?p=4901#comment-12888</guid>
		<description>Why try to change the design? Why not improve longevity of the bike, it&#039;s comfort, it&#039;s carrying capacity or just reduce the cost whilst maintaining the quality?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why try to change the design? Why not improve longevity of the bike, it&#8217;s comfort, it&#8217;s carrying capacity or just reduce the cost whilst maintaining the quality?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mandy</title>
		<link>http://designholeonline.com/2009/the-conundrum-of-modern-bicycle-design/comment-page-1/#comment-8963</link>
		<dc:creator>Mandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 01:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designholeonline.com/?p=4901#comment-8963</guid>
		<description>The vanilla is yummy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The vanilla is yummy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

